Leadership Insights
Why High-Performing Individuals Don’t Always Operate as High-Performing Teams
It might sound counterintuitive, but a group made up of individual high performers does not always translate to a high-performing team. The fact that these professionals excel at their primary jobs doesn’t automatically mean they will work cohesively and effectively as a team. A poorly functioning team is problematic at any level, but when it involves executive leadership, the consequences are often more significant—hindering innovation, creating dysfunction, and preventing the company from achieving its goals.
Though it’s a fairly common occurrence, proven strategies can help organizations avoid team performance problems by equipping leaders to work more effectively together.
First: Why Are We a Team?
Businesses often bring a group of leaders together as a team without defining WHY they need to function as such. Many times, the leadership team is simply a group of peers who each head up a different functional area; it exists as a team in name only.
When companies don’t take the time to identify a team’s purpose—articulating why a group of leaders needs to work collaboratively and collectively—it inadvertently encourages individuals to focus only on their own functional area. With no shared purpose or goals, it becomes easy for individuals to advocate for and serve the needs of their functional group, rather than the collective good.
Some companies are beginning to acknowledge this pitfall and holding leaders more broadly accountable, beyond siloed objectives. A few have even gone to the extreme of telling senior leaders that if a different functional group with the company fails to achieve its goals, and your group could have done something to help them succeed, then your group failed, too.
Why High Performers Might Fail as a Team
Beyond the failure to define the team’s purpose, there are other reasons a group of high-performing leaders might not operate as a high value-creating team.
- Leaders are often incentivized and compensated for achieving function-specific targets, leaving them less focused on and motivated to strive toward shared goals.
- When leaders get pulled into day-to-day issues, they lose sight of the upstream and downstream effects of their group’s actions, creating an even greater inward focus.
- Leaders don’t always speak a common language—primarily because their areas of expertise differ—so it becomes difficult to understand and empathize with each other.
- Since professionals who reach the senior executive level are often highly driven, in the absence of a team-level mandate they might be more inclined to compete vs collaborate.
- In some organizations, a culture of finger-pointing becomes firmly entrenched and sets up leaders to unintentionally work at cross purposes.
- Organizations often lack the integrated systems and data to support a single version of the truth, causing individual leaders to focus on and aim for dissimilar success metrics.
- Many companies celebrate heroes rather than groups, creating a culture in which individual accomplishments are deemed more important than team achievements.
- Working collaboratively as an executive team demands the ability to influence without authority, a powerful technique that even high performers struggle to master.
Setting Up High Performers To Succeed Together
Though many forces can keep strong performers from working effectively as a team, strategies like the following can set up senior leaders to perform as well as a group as they do individually.
- Help the team define its purpose. The organization’s leadership team needs to align around a clear purpose—a step that Peter Hawkins describes as “commissioning” in his Five Disciplines of High Value-Creating Teams model. But it’s rare that a leadership team takes time to step back and consider who they serve, and how. The answers to these key questions form the foundation for working together as a unit toward shared goals.
- Rethink compensation models. While it’s critical to motivate leaders to achieve function-specific targets, be sure the compensation model isn’t skewed entirely in that direction. Balancing functional area goals with company-level goals gets leaders thinking and working as a group and aligned around common objectives.
- Encourage an organizational perspective. We’ve all seen it happen: The sales team provides incentives for customers to purchase at higher volume without discussing the plan with manufacturing. Or engineering creates a product design without fully involving manufacturing to ensure it’s feasible. Unfortunately, real-world examples abound. Aligning leaders around common goals helps them to gain a broader organizational perspective and reduce the risk of developing strategies and plans that don’t consider upstream and downstream effects.
- Leverage the third-party objectivity of a coach. Some CEOs find it difficult to hold other executives accountable for working together, lacking the time or the comfort level. And some have trouble objectively assessing how their behaviors impact the team’s ability to function. A skilled coach can address both challenges, helping the CEO succeed as an integral member of the leadership team and as leader of that team. A coach can also help all team members understand how their behaviors affect the team, coalesce around a common vision and purpose, and leverage natural synergies.
- Assess your data sources. Since metrics are powerful tools for motivating behavior, evaluate the data sources your leaders use to measure performance and ensure they’re aligned. Where possible, discourage functional groups from creating their own ways of tracking and monitoring metrics, to avoid different versions of the truth.
- Create opportunities to build rapport. Forming bonds takes time that leaders often feel they don’t have, and remote work can make it even more difficult. Periodic off-site meetings don’t just help leadership teams focus on broader goals without the distractions of daily problems; they also facilitate building trust by bringing people together face-to-face.
- Build a culture of psychological safety. A widely-quoted Google study called Project Aristotle found that psychological safety is one of the greatest predictors of team performance. Take a candid look at the dynamics of your leadership team and ensure the environment is conducive to speaking freely, thinking creatively, and putting forth new ideas.
To thrive in a fast-changing world, organizations need high performers throughout the organization, and especially at the top. But bringing together high-performing individuals doesn’t automatically result in a high-functioning team. By recognizing the obstacles that can keep strong performers from working optimally as a group, businesses can take proven steps to turn their top leaders into high value-creating teams.
The Leadership Advisory Practice at Odgers Berndtson helps organizations discover and develop leaders, strengthen value-creating teams, and prepare for what’s next. Learn how our highly experienced assessors and coaches can help you and your team make a positive impact on your organization and those around you.